Compare
Test automation without the scripts.
Hand-written automation suites turn every UI change into a test change. testdart turns requirements and test scenarios directly into executable browser tests, so there is nothing to script and nothing to repair.
3/3 passed
Side by side
Where the hours go.
| Scripted automation | testdart | |
|---|---|---|
| What you write | Test code and a framework | Nothing: requirements are the input |
| When the UI changes | Scripts need updating | No scripts to update |
| Coverage design | Whoever writes the script decides | Positive, negative, boundary and integration cases per requirement |
| Link to requirements | Kept by convention, if at all | Every test linked to its requirement |
| Failure analysis | Read the stack trace | A reason for every failure, with steps and screenshots |
How it works
Watch one requirement become a tested release.
The whole loop in under a minute: AI Genie writes and runs the tests, Project Brain grounds them in your spec, requirements show what is covered, reports show what broke. Sample project, representative UI.
A real browser
Tests run headed in Chrome, so you can watch every click the agent makes.
Traced to requirements
Every test case links to the requirement it proves, and every failure to the one it breaks.
Your call on autonomy
Review cases before they run in copilot mode, or let autonomous mode go end to end.
FAQ
Common questions.
No. testdart turns requirements and test scenarios directly into executable browser tests, so there is no script or framework for your team to write or maintain.
1 requirement → test cases → a run → a report
Your next release, tested before it ships.
Point testdart at one requirement you care about. You'll have test cases, a real-browser run and a report in a single sitting.